Get notified when new blogs drop

Is Jesus God or just a prophet?

-

— Jethro (Ghana)

At various times in Jesus' life on earth He made claims and acted in ways which are exclusive to God. Prominent among these are John 10:30, where he claimed He and the Father are one and of the same essence; John 8:57-59, where He claimed His prominence and pre-existence over Abraham and referred to Himself as “I AM”—an exclusive name of God (Exodus 3:13,14). 


Also, in Mark 3:5-12, Jesus claimed to have authority to forgive sins. Forgiveness of sins is an exclusive authority belonging to God (Isaiah 43:25, Micah 7:18, Psalm 103:12) but Jesus exercised that authority on earth and claimed to support it with the healing of the paralytic in question. And the person was indeed healed.

So clearly Jesus did claim to be & acted as God. Also Apostle Paul supports this (Philippians 2.5-9,) and called Jesus “our great God” (Titus 2.11-13). Thomas worship Jesus and called Him “My LORD and My God” (John 20.26-28).

No Prophet will make such claims or have others refer to him as such as Jesus did. Jesus cannot be just a Prophet. He's more, He's God who came in flesh and blood to pay for our sins through his death and resurrection, in order reconcile us to the Father above (John 14:6).

If this question resonates with you, you’re not alone.

You’re welcome to submit your own question about Jesus—anonymously or by name—using the Ask Me Anything About Jesus form. Some questions are answered privately; others are shared publicly so more people can learn and grow together.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prophecy, the Middle East, and What We Must Do Now

-
Image
 “We should not just sit and watch the news in fear. Instead, we must take these three steps...” If you have been watching the news today, you know that something very big is happening. Reports have confirmed that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in a joint strike by the USA and Israel. Iran is already fighting back with missiles, and Russia has stepped in to support Iran and speak against the attack. For Christians who study the Bible, these events are very important. Jesus talked about this in Matthew 24:6-7 . He warned that there would be " wars and rumors of wars " and that " nations would rise against nations ." While there have always been wars, the size and intensity of what is happening right now is different. It is clear and very serious. Jesus said, “Such things must happen, but the end is still to come” (Matthew 24:6) Many people believe this is leading to a famous prophecy found in Ezekiel 38 and 39 . This prophecy describes a gr...
Read more

Prophet El-Bernard vs Prophet Samuel: Using Prophet Samuel to Defend Failed Prophecies

-
Image
El-Bernard and Prophet Samuel: Did they both miss it? We have all seen the videos circulating this week. A popular prophet, El-Bernard, prophesied a specific victory in the recent NPP Flagbearer elections. But when the votes were counted on Saturday, the result was different. Now, social media is buzzing with defenses. The most popular one is the "Samuel Defense." People are quoting 1 Samuel 16:6 , where the Prophet Samuel looks at Eliab and says, " Surely the Lord’s anointed is before Him. " The argument goes: "See? Even the great Prophet Samuel missed it. He got it wrong, so cut the modern prophets some slack." But others have pushed back, arguing that Samuel only thought this—he didn’t say it. So, who is right? It is true that modern translations like the NIV and ESV state that Samuel "thought," but the KJV, NKJV, and ASV all render the word in 1 Samuel 16:6 as "said." This is accurate to the Hebrew because the word used ( amar ) ref...
Read more

When an Exception Becomes a Rule: Rethinking Acts 2 and Tongues

-
Image
"To reject modern tongues simply because they do not resemble Acts 2 in being understood by their hearers is to elevate a narrative description over clear apostolic instruction..." One of the most common objections to speaking in tongues today is the claim that biblical tongues must always be intelligible human languages — because in Acts 2, the hearers understood what was spoken in their own languages. Closely related to this is another argument drawn from the same passage: since most human languages are now known, tongues are no longer necessary or relevant today. (I’ll address that particular claim in a separate article. For now, the more pressing question is whether Acts 2 was ever meant to be the sole standard for tongues at all.) “And they were amazed and astonished, saying, ‘Are not all these who are speaking Galileans? And how is it that we hear, each of us in his own native language?’” (Acts 2:7–8) That objection rests on a selective reading of Scripture. Acts 2 is t...
Read more